We promise that this article will be a fair figma vs. miro comparison. Before you scream – Ah, this is an unfair comparison!!, Figma is primarily a design tool, while Miro is an online whiteboard tool; – let me explain this. Figma has this offering called Figjam, which is building up as a worthy competitor for Miro. Before starting with the comparison, let’s learn a bit about Figjam and Miro in a straightforward manner.
What is Figjam?
FigJam is a powerful brainstorming tool that makes it simple to involve your entire team in a collaborative mode. Using the whiteboarding tool, you can:
- To discuss and organize ideas, use sticky notes and shapes.
- Use the marker to do freehand drawings, make notes on the screen, or scribble down fast ideas.
- Use stickers, stamps, and comments to highlight questions or give ideas for your support.
- Copy and paste information from FigJam and Figma without any issues so that everything is kept in one location.
- With these tools, you can create diagrams, map out user journeys, analyze data, and do much more. To assist novice users in getting started, FigJam also provides free templates.
Fair enough; what is Miro?
A digital whiteboard that makes it simple to collaborate with others, Miro (formerly RealtimeBoard) markets itself as such. You can use the software to organize objects, make notes and designs, and engage in online conversations or embedded video calls for communication. The tool includes several pre-built templates that can act as models or as a springboard for your project work. When doing live, remote design thinking workshops, we use the online whiteboarding tool and apply Miro.
Miro is often used for the following things:
- Establishing a focus list of concepts or subjects for a significant project
- The creation of a customer journey or user story
- A new product notion or idea is wireframed.
- Constructing a road map or strategy for a workshop or program on innovation
- In an agile culture, conducting a more interesting or creative meeting for your team
Figma vs. Miro – a side-by-side comparison
| Figjam(a part of Figma) | Miro |
| Free trial: No | Free trial: Yes |
| Freemium version: Yes | Freemium version: Yes, and fares comparatively better than Figjam in features |
| No of users: Data not found for Figjam, but Figma has around 4 million users | No of users: 35 million users |
| Launch date: 2021 | Launch date: 2011 |
| Founder: Emily Lin, Product Manager, Figjam | Founders: Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin |
| Supported platforms: Only Web(SaaS) | Supported platforms: Windows, Mac, Web, iPhone, iPad, Android |
| Target audience: Teams who need a simple and basic collaborative whiteboard | Target audience: UX/UI designers, agile coaches, product owners/managers, graphic designers, web developers, marketing & advertising firms, creative sectors & consulting |
| Support center: Only online | Support center: Online, 24/7 Live support |
| Pricing: Starts with $3/editor/month(billed annually) | Pricing: Starts with $8/member/month(billed annually) |
| Training support: Documentation | Training support: Documentation, webinars, live training online |
| Product categories: Online whiteboarding | Product categories: Collaboration, UI Design, Whiteboard, IT Project Management, Kanban, Mind MappingProduct Management, Remote Work toolScreen Sharing, Scrum, Workflow Management, Idea Management |
| Integrations: Integrates with Figma | Integrations: Airtable, Axure RP, Bitrix24, Freshdesk, Jira Software, Kosy Office, Livestorm, and 90 other integrations |
| Reviews in a nutshell: Capterra: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.8) GetApp: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.7) G2 Crowd: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.6) | Reviews in a nutshell: G2 Crowd: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.8) GetApp: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.7) Capterra: ⭐⭐⭐⭐(4.7) |
Figma vs. Miro – comparison in terms of user’s voice
Figjam user reviews(Audience pulse:7.6/10)
| Pros | Cons |
| Simple wireframing Great templates Live collaboration Faster iterations Basic yet powerful UX | It feels like a floaty software, as per a few users Offline work is quite difficult Navigation can be confusing, as per a few users Draft version for each page can be available |
Miro user reviews(Audience pulse:8.9/10)
| Pros | Cons |
| The user-friendly and narrow learning curve Top-notch support Better features for meeting System availability & stability Multiple features for wider usage | Too many options as per few users Email notifications are preferred Cost per user can be lesser |
Final verdict: Figma vs Miro
The winner of the FigJam vs. Miro contest will be Miro, the current market leader in online whiteboard tools for team collaborations, as it offers more features and conveniences than FigJam. Note that Figjam is a brand-new product that will only grow in popularity as it develops. Figma is a very helpful and intriguing platform working to develop its ecosystem. Get started with Miro in simple clicks.
